The Relationships Between Elite Academics and Power Infographic

It must be stressed, however, that the anti-intellectualism of the Soviet political elite was closely associated with the fact that the Russian academic milieu, as a part of the tsarist state apparatus, had been hostile to the 1917 Bolshevik takeover almost by definition; however, when dealing with practical issues such as economic and scientific management, the early Soviet regime had to resort to such "bourgeois experts", therefore the tense relationship between the Communist Party elite and non-Party educated people. It was only during the early 1930s that attempted to replace the old intelligentsia with a new, Party-approved group. Such favouring of - that is to say, a partisan stance towards all matters intellectual - over formal scholarship, no matter how crude such partisan stance happened to be - in the end amounted to a clear anti-intellectual stance.


New World Order (conspiracy theory) - Wikipedia

I Know Why Poor Whites Chant Trump, Trump, Trump

Some modern American anti-intellectualism originates from the view held by some that the current form of public education subverts religious belief. The validity of this view was substantiated by the spread of and among the educated during the , and was deep-rooted even before that time. For instance, the writer and wrote in 1642, "The more learned and witty you bee, the more fit to act for will you bee." More recently, an anti-intellectual current is claimed by some in the works of Christian cartoonist . In his tract for example, he depicts the academic establishment as intolerant and elitist in their rejection of .

The Koch Brothers’ Covert Operations | The New Yorker

But class hasn’t completely dropped out of our political discourse. In fact, it’s made a comeback of late, only in a particularly devious new guise, our new ruling paradigm of red state vs. blue state—where ideology is rewritten as region (Republicans are from red states, Democrats from blue), region as culture (red-staters drink beer, blue-staters drink wine), and culture as class, though only implicitly (what do you think beer and wine really mean?). Fifty-seven million people voted for John Kerry in the last election; to speak as if all of them were Chardonnay-sipping professors, or even professionals, is ridiculous. Simple arithmetic tells us that millions of them were members of the working class. But according to the dominant syllogism, if Kerry voters are effete elitists while Bush voters are “ordinary Americans” (the closest anyone comes to actually saying working class anymore) then the working class looks like the stereotypical Bush voter: rural, Southern, conservative, nationalist, and fundamentalist—in other words, redneck. This is as gross an oversimplification as imagining that the middle class is composed exclusively of leftist academics. But absent any other or better images of the working class, the redneck myth not only means that Republicans get to present themselves as champions of the working class while ostensibly denying its existence (as Thomas Frank has argued in What’s the Matter with Kansas), it also means that the true character of the working class, in all its enormous breadth and diversity, remains hidden.

PHOTOS: Academic elites in Iran meet with Leader of Islamic Ummah and Oppressed Ayatollah Imam Khamenei Islamic Invitation Turke
realistic Art Gallery,Portrait Lessons: how to draw photo realistic colored pencil portraits.

I Know Why Poor Whites Chant Trump, Trump, Trump – …

“Why the World is the Way It Is: Cultural Relativism and It’s Descendents” by Dr

America’s elite An hereditary meritocracy - The Economist

Franklin Roosevelt knew of the Pearl Harbor at least attack 6 weeks before it happened

In America some academics and thinkers on the left ..