Discrimination workforce essay Discursive essay size zero ..
Understanding ageism: Lessons from feminism and postmodernism
Charlotte Witt (2011a; 2011b) argues for a particularsort of gender essentialism, which Witt terms‘uniessentialism’. Her motivation and starting point isthe following: many ordinary social agents report gender beingessential to them and claim that they would be a different person werethey of a different sex/gender. Uniessentialism attempts to understandand articulate this. However, Witt's work departs in importantrespects from the earlier (so-called) essentialist or gender realistpositions discussed in Section 2: Witt does not posit some essentialproperty of womanhood of the kind discussed above, which failed totake women's differences into account. Further, uniessentialismdiffers significantly from those position developed in response to theproblem of how we should conceive of women's social kind. It is notabout solving the standard dispute between gender nominalists andgender realists, or about articulating some supposedly shared propertythat binds women together and provides a theoretical ground forfeminist political solidarity. Rather, uniessentialism aims to makegood the widely held belief that gender is constitutive of who weare.
age-discrimination in the built ..
In addition to her revisionary argument, Haslanger has suggested thather ameliorative analysis of woman may not be as revisionaryas it first seems (2005, 2006). Although successful in their referencefixing, ordinary language users do not always know precisely what theyare talking about. Our language use may be skewed by oppressiveideologies that can “mislead us about the content of our ownthoughts” (Haslanger 2005, 12). Although her gender terminologyis not intuitive, this could simply be because oppressive ideologiesmislead us about the meanings of our gender terms. Our everyday genderterminology might mean something utterly different from what wethink it means; and we could be entirely ignorant ofthis. Perhaps Haslanger's analysis, then, has captured our everydaygender vocabulary revealing to us the terms that we actually employ:we may be applying ‘woman’ in our everyday language on thebasis of sex-marked subordination whether we take ourselves to bedoing so or not. If this is so, Haslanger's gender terminology is notradically revisionist.