Drinking and driving is a serious crime in all fifty states.

Despite the fact that both sides showcase decent evidence, only one brings hard-hitting facts that truly make a difference: the legal drinking age should not be lowered because it helps prevents youths from driving drunk, it helps prevent youths from committing violent crimes, and it helps prevent incomplete develop of the brain....

Many people drink and drive without thinking about the consequences.

Drunk driving accidents are the number one killer of adolescents (Teenagers and peer pressures.

Thus, making it seem like it is acceptable to drink and drive.

The era of prohibition lasted for few days and was proofed unsuccessful mechanism to control the social practices of Americans. However, the alcohol drinking age has remained the subject matter in policymaker’s decisions and endeavors. While the legally accepted drinking age has remained fixed at twenty one in the United States of America, many nations have revised the policy to have a broader control over the sale of alcoholic beverages. Although this policy is viable in raising a healthy nation, it is not conducive to a democratic republic which teaches freedom and liberty for all its over eighteen years’ citizens and therefore, rendering the present drinking age instinctively defective.

Drinking and eating makes more fun while driving.

Despite the religious and social beliefs, there are several arguments which strongly support the present drinking age in America. The main argument in support of higher legal drinking age is that it helps to reduce road accidents caused by the dunked youth. However, if road safety is really the focal concern, then it is more helpful to rise the legal driving age. Nevertheless, nations which hold both driving and drinking age at eighteen years have safer highways compared to America.

The solution to this would be in lowering the drinking age and raising the driving age....
One of the number one causes of death is actually from drinking and driving.

Drinking and driving in the uk | Law Teacher

Aricle-3B
Heritability of DUIConvictions: A Twin Study of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol.
Background: The study was undertaken to assess the relative contributions of genetic and environmental influences on drunk-driving. Methods: Driving records of a cohort of male and female twins (N = 17,360) from the Mid-Atlantic Twin Registry were examined. Structural equation models were used to estimate the magnitude of genetic and environmental effects on male and female phenotypes, and test for gender differences. Results: There were significant gender and age effects. Compared with females, males were five times more likely to engage in driving under the influence. Among persons aged 21–49 years, the risk for drunk-driving was eight times that for those aged 50+ years and five times greater than those ≤20 years. In both males and females, aged 21–49 years, a large proportion (57%) of the variance in drunk-driving was due to genetic factors and the remaining 43% due to individual specific environmental influences. Conclusions: Drunk-driving is under significant genetic influence in both males and females. Our findings suggest that a different set of genes influence DUIs in men and women. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The fact is that drinking and driving is a huge deal and can leave a long trail of broken dreams and hearts.

Free drunk driving papers, essays, and research papers

MADD also focuses on underage drinking and of course includes any and all people, whether fathers, sisters, grandparents, neighbors and friends, who work to “stop drunk driving and support the victims of this violent crime” (MADD, 2014).

If you drink and drive, not only are you putting yourself at risk, but your passengers and the pedestrians outside of your vehicle....

Related Post of Alcohol and drunken driving essays conclusions;

Abstract
Driving while impaired by alcohol (DWI) is responsible for substantial mortality and injury. Significant gaps in our understanding of DWI re-offending, or recidivism, reduce our ability to practically assess recidivism probability and to match interventions to individual risk profiles. These shortcomings reflect the baffling heterogeneity in the DWI population and the limited focus of much existing DWI recidivism research to psychosocial, psychological and substance use correlates. Approach. This narrative review summarizes the evidence for the contribution of neurocognitive and psychobiological mechanisms to DWI behavior and recidivism. Given the nascent nature of this literature, insight into the putative contribution of these mechanisms to DWI is also drawn from other experimental literatures, particularly those on alcohol use disorders and cognitive and behavioral neuroscience. Key Findings. Alcohol-related neurotoxicity and dysregulation of hypothalamic– pituitary– adrenal axis and serotonergic systems may underlie certain offender characteristics consistently correlated with heightened DWI risk, persistence and intervention resistance. Their markers are less vulnerable to sources of bias than subjective psychosocial indices and are more far-reaching than alcohol abuse in explaining DWI behavior and recidivism. Implications. The investigation of neurocognitive and psychobiological mechanisms in DWI research is a promising avenue for discerning clinically meaningful subgroups within the DWI population. This can lead to research and development in alternative assessment and more targeted intervention technologies. Conclusion. Multidimensional research in DWI and recidivism offers novel avenues for increasing road safety.[Brown TG, Ouimet MC, Nadeau L, Gianoulakis C, Lepage M, Tremblay J, Dongier M. From the brain to bad behaviour and back again: Neurocognitive and psychobiological mechanisms of driving while impaired by alcohol. Drug Alcohol Rev 2009;28:406–418] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]