Essay on Structuralism -- Social Sciences Structuralism …
define structuralism and discuss its contributions to biblical interpretation
Structuralist Criticism; Biblical Structuralism
As we arrive at chapters 8-9, we are painfully aware that the four methods for reading the Bible addressed so far (literary/source, form, redaction, and canon criticisms) have major shortcomings. To be sure, each of these methods have their advantages and afford us interpretive insights. Source criticism, for example, helps us to discern written sources upon which biblical tradents (those who passed on the traditions) drew in creating and developing biblical texts. Form and redaction criticisms contribute to understanding genre, life-setting, and editorial activity, respectively. But Barton observes that for all their benefits, these methods do no individually or collectively solve all interpretive problems, and more importantly, they do not elucidate what the text means to the believer today, for they are historical (not theological) approaches that divest individual texts of their current canonical context. Canon criticism seeks to address this latter problem, but as Barton illustrates, Childs’ version of canon criticism is fraught with problems and fails to meet the theological goals that he sets. At the end of the day, according to Barton, canon criticism is really beneficial not to theology but to literary criticism (in the proper sense; see Barton, 20). And this leads us to the topic of structuralism, the focus of this week’s unit.?
Functionalism vs Structuralism Essay - 863 Words | Cram
Post Structuralism Essay - 378 Words
Tzvetan Todorov is another literary theorist who took Saussure's ideas in new directions. He was buddies with Jakobson and Propp, and he believed that the literary theorist's task was to identify the underlying principles that governed works of literature. Like Barthes, he was very influential in popularizing the structuralist approach in literary studies.
Strengths And Weaknesses Of Structuralism, Essay Sample
was one of the earliest and most important of the structuralist literary theorists who applied structural ideas to literature. But Barthes is kind of a tricky one. He started out as a structuralist, and then later came to be associated with post-structuralism. Barthes was one of the first literary theorists to take Saussure's ideas and apply them to the study of literature. But did Barthes stop at literary narratives? Oh no! He also applied Saussure's ideas to other forms of cultural and social phenomena. He looked at fashion, at food, at the media, and tried to uncover the deep structures of meaning under all those everyday cultural phenomena.