Free euthanasia Essays and Papers - 123helpme
The only rules which are morally good are those which can be universalised. The person in favour of euthanasia argues that giving everybody the right to have a good death through euthanasia is acceptable as a universal principle, and that euthanasia is therefore morally acceptable. This is sound, but is not a full justification.If a person wants to be allowed to commit euthanasia, it would clearly be inconsistent for them to say that they didn't think it should be allowed for other people.But the principle of universalisability doesn't actually provide any positive justification for anything - genuine moral rules must be universalisable, but universalisability is not enough to say that a rule is a satisfactory moral rule.Universalisability is therefore only a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition for a rule to be a morally good rule.So, other than showing that one pre-condition is met, universalisibility doesn't advance the case for euthanasia at all. Every case is different in some respect, so anyone who is inclined to argue about it can argue about whether the particular differences are sufficent to make this case an exception to the rule. Oddly enough, the law of universalisability allows for there to be exceptions - as long as the exceptions are themselves universalisable.
Welcome to Exit (the Scottish Voluntary Euthanasia Society)
Free argumentative Essays and Papers - 123helpme
"The Dutch seem reluctant to acknowledge that the doctor's role in euthanasia is more than that of a neutral observer responding to a patient's needs. This is particularly evident when families pressure patients to request euthanasia .... more requests for euthanasia came from families than from patients themselves." [emphasis added] p. 93
RESEARCH LITERATURE: DEATH & DYING This is a large file
Families or individuals thinking about euthanasia should get
all the facts first about the research being done on the particular illness
that has invaded a member of their family.