Global Justice: Seminal Essays ..
Global Justice Seminal Essays Table Contents
A distinction is often drawn between global and internationaljustice. The key point of difference between these two notionsinvolves clarifying the entities among which justice is sought. Ininternational justice the nation or state is taken as the centralentity of concern and justice among nations or states is the focus. Inthe domain of global justice, by contrast, theorists do not seekprimarily to define justice between states or nations. Ratherthey drill down through the state shell and inquire about what justiceamong human beings consists in. Global justice inquiries takeindividual human beings as of primary concern and seek to give anaccount of what fairness among such agents involves. There are a rangeof actions that cut across states or involve different agents,relationships, and structures that might be invisible in an inquiryseeking justice among states exclusively. Many different kinds ofinteractions are not circumscribed by state membership and yet canimportantly affect human beings’ most fundamental interests, soasking the question about what individual human beings owe one anotheroften uncovers significant neglected features of relationships andstructures that are of normative concern. Global justice analyses arenot precluded from yielding state-level obligations; indeed, theytypically do. However, they consider a wider array of possible agentsand organizations that might have duties as well.
Table of contents for Global justice : seminal essays ..
Theories of global justice aim to help us understand our worldbetter and what our responsibilities are in it. While sometheorists aim purely at theoretical understanding, others hope also toprovide an analysis that can be useful in practical policy makingconcerning global justice matters.