Symposium, by Plato - Essay Example

"...not easy to dispel great slanders..." The only reason that the present charges against Socrates were credible was because of the reputation he already had.

The Symposium Quotes by Plato - Good Reads

If Socrates' words were going to be remembered, the spectators were going to have to record them.

Love in 'The Symposium' Essay 89782 - AcaDemon

"What is the branch of philosophy that is concerned with how we know things?" To speak of branches -- i.e. that picture of things -- in this case is misleading: it would be clearer here to speak of facets of philosophy (facets or aspects) -- because the question "How do you know?" (Epistemology) cannot be separated from the questions "What do you know?" (Metaphysics) and "How can you express what you know?" (Logic) or whether seeking to know the truth is the basis of philosophy (Ethics), for some Sophists claimed, contra Socrates, that it is not, either (1) because the truth is not knowable, or (2) because the truth and its contrary are merely tools to be used towards other ends; thus their promise to "make the worse appear the better" reason.

free essay on Plato’s Ideas of Love

Once a form has been reached in this way, division begins. This is amatter of “cutting the form up again, by relation to[sub-]forms, by relation to its natural joints” (265e1-2). As anexample, Socrates cites the case of love itself:

These will be noted at the appropriate points in the course of Socrates' speech.

Essay 4: The Gender of Love in Plato | Priyanka's Essays

We are of course familiar with the dialogue form through ouracquaintance with the literary genre of drama. But Plato's dialogues donot try to create a fictional world for the purposes of telling astory, as many literary dramas do; nor do they invoke an earliermythical realm, like the creations of the great Greek tragediansAeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides. Nor are they all presented in theform of a drama: in many of them, a single speaker narrates events inwhich he participated. They are philosophical discussions—“debates” would, in some cases, also be an appropriate word—among a small number of interlocutors, many of whom can beidentified as real historical figures; and often they begin with adepiction of the setting of the discussion—a visit to a prison,a wealthy man's house, a celebration over drinks, a religious festival,a visit to the gymnasium, a stroll outside the city's wall, a long walkon a hot day. As a group, they form vivid portraits of a social world,and are not purely intellectual exchanges between characterless andsocially unmarked speakers. (At any rate, that is true of a largenumber of Plato's interlocutors. However, it must be added that in someof his works the speakers display little or no character. See, forexample, Sophist and Statesman—dialogues inwhich a visitor from the town of Elea in Southern Italy leads thediscussion; and Laws, a discussion between an unnamed Athenianand two named fictional characters, one from Crete and the other fromSparta.) In many of his dialogues (though not all), Plato isnot only attempting to draw his readers into a discussion, but is alsocommenting on the social milieu that he is depicting, and criticizingthe character and ways of life of his interlocutors. Some of thedialogues that most evidently fall into this category areProtagoras, Gorgias, Hippias Major,Euthydemus, and Symposium.

In Plato’s Symposium each member of the drinking party gives their own interpretation of love.

A Reaction against Loneliness; Plato's Symposium on Love

In that respect, Socrates now should be protected by the First Amendment, since everything he did would be protected by freedom of speech (, or ) and of religion.

"If your sons were colts or calves..." Socrates loves his barnyard analogies.

Symposium plato essay papers - Garage Door Remotes

Since the sign has not stopped him "when I left home," "when I came into court," or "at any time...during my speech," Socrates must infer that he was never doing anything wrong.

you speak in riddles and in jest..." Socrates draws the obvious conclusion.

Essay plato symposium - TW. Ministries

In Alcibiades’ love story, in particular, these two desires areself-consciously in play: “Socrates is the only man in the worldwho has made me feel shame… I know perfectly well that I can’tprove he’s wrong when he tells me what I should do: yet, the moment Ileave his side, I go back to my old ways: I cave in to my desire toplease the crowd” (216b1–5). Even such awareness ofconflict as is manifested here, however, is no guarantee of asatisfactory resolution. For the new love—the one that seems tooffer coherence, satisfaction, and release from shame—may turnout to be just the old frustrating one in disguise.