The Symposium Quotes by Plato - Good Reads
Love in 'The Symposium' Essay 89782 - AcaDemon
"What is the branch of philosophy that is concerned with how we know things?" To speak of branches -- i.e. that picture of things -- in this case is misleading: it would be clearer here to speak of facets of philosophy (facets or aspects) -- because the question "How do you know?" (Epistemology) cannot be separated from the questions "What do you know?" (Metaphysics) and "How can you express what you know?" (Logic) or whether seeking to know the truth is the basis of philosophy (Ethics), for some Sophists claimed, contra Socrates, that it is not, either (1) because the truth is not knowable, or (2) because the truth and its contrary are merely tools to be used towards other ends; thus their promise to "make the worse appear the better" reason.
free essay on Plato’s Ideas of Love
Once a form has been reached in this way, division begins. This is amatter of “cutting the form up again, by relation to[sub-]forms, by relation to its natural joints” (265e1-2). As anexample, Socrates cites the case of love itself:
Essay 4: The Gender of Love in Plato | Priyanka's Essays
We are of course familiar with the dialogue form through ouracquaintance with the literary genre of drama. But Plato's dialogues donot try to create a fictional world for the purposes of telling astory, as many literary dramas do; nor do they invoke an earliermythical realm, like the creations of the great Greek tragediansAeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides. Nor are they all presented in theform of a drama: in many of them, a single speaker narrates events inwhich he participated. They are philosophical discussions—“debates” would, in some cases, also be an appropriate word—among a small number of interlocutors, many of whom can beidentified as real historical figures; and often they begin with adepiction of the setting of the discussion—a visit to a prison,a wealthy man's house, a celebration over drinks, a religious festival,a visit to the gymnasium, a stroll outside the city's wall, a long walkon a hot day. As a group, they form vivid portraits of a social world,and are not purely intellectual exchanges between characterless andsocially unmarked speakers. (At any rate, that is true of a largenumber of Plato's interlocutors. However, it must be added that in someof his works the speakers display little or no character. See, forexample, Sophist and Statesman—dialogues inwhich a visitor from the town of Elea in Southern Italy leads thediscussion; and Laws, a discussion between an unnamed Athenianand two named fictional characters, one from Crete and the other fromSparta.) In many of his dialogues (though not all), Plato isnot only attempting to draw his readers into a discussion, but is alsocommenting on the social milieu that he is depicting, and criticizingthe character and ways of life of his interlocutors. Some of thedialogues that most evidently fall into this category areProtagoras, Gorgias, Hippias Major,Euthydemus, and Symposium.