The Value of Religion Essay -- Religion, Faith, …

The civil religion has been a point of articulationbetween the profoundest commitments of Western religious and philosophicaltradition and the common beliefs of ordinary Americans.

Personal Life Values - Family, Religion and Education

Religion enriches people's morals,for the welfare of the individual and society at large.

The Value of Religion Essay - 1354 Words | Bartleby

While integration seems attractive (especially to theologians), it isdifficult to do justice to both the science and religion aspects of agiven domain, especially given their complexities. For example, PierreTeilhard de Chardin (1971), who was both knowledgeable inpaleoanthropology and theology, ended up with an unconventional viewof evolution as teleological (which brought him into trouble with thescientific establishment), and with an unorthodox theology (with anunconventional interpretation of original sin that brought him intotrouble with the Roman Catholic Church). Theological heterodoxy, byitself, is no reason to doubt a model, but it points to difficultiesfor the integration model in becoming successful in the broadercommunity of theologians and philosophers. Moreover, integration seemsskewed towards theism as Barbour described arguments based onscientific results that support (but do not demonstrate) theism, butfailed to discuss arguments based on scientific results that support(but do not demonstrate) the denial of theism.

Personal Values And Beliefs Theology Religion Essay

Now, even though the realms of religion and science in themselves areclearly marked off from each other, nevertheless there exist between thetwo strong reciprocal relationships and dependencies. Though religion maybe that which determines the goal, it has, nevertheless, learned from science,in the broadest sense, what means will contribute to the attainment ofthe goals it has set up. But science can only be created by those who arethoroughly imbued with the aspiration toward truth and understanding. Thissource of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion. To thisthere also belongs the faith in the possibility that the regulations validfor the world of existence are rational, that is, comprehensible to reason.I cannot conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound faith. Thesituation may be expressed by an image: science without religion is lame,religion without science is blind.

For example it is a system for the survival of the fittest and reproduction....
Evidence of religious strife and abuse exist in almost every society throughout history.

Value of religion essay - HORTI Recursos

Religion is not usually the first thing on a mind of a person looking at a society or how that society is affected by the religion the country worships.

Religion are different from their beliefs about the cosmos and human nature.

American Beliefs and Values Essay ..

Most philosophy of religion in the west has focused on differentversions of theism. Ancient philosophy of religion wrestled with thecredibility of monotheism and polytheism in opposition to skepticismand very primitive naturalistic schemes. For example, Platoargued that the view that God is singularly good should be preferred tothe portrait of the gods that was articulated in Greek poetictradition, according to which there are many gods, often imperfect andsubject to vice and ignorance. The emergence and development ofJudaism, Christianity, and Islam on a global scale secured thecentrality of theism for philosophical enquiry, but the relevance of aphilosophical exploration of theism is not limited to those interestedin these religions and the cultures in which they flourish. Whiletheism has generally flourished in religious traditions amid religiouspractices, one may be a theist without adopting any religion whatever,and one may find theistic elements (however piecemeal) in Confucianism,Hinduism, some versions of Mahayana Buddhism, as well as in thereligions of some smaller scale societies. The debate over theismalso has currency for secular humanism and religious forms of atheismas in Theravada Buddhist philosophy. Consider first thephilosophical project of articulating theism and then the philosophy ofdivine attributes.

There are many different religions around the world and many different beliefs.

Here is your essay on religious pluralism as value in India

In the history of the debate over positivism, the most radicalcharge was that positivism is self-refuting. The empiricistcriterion of meaning itself does not seem to be a statement thatexpresses the formal relation of ideas, nor does it appear to beempirically verifiable. How might one empirically verify theprinciple? At best, the principle of verification seems to be arecommendation as to how to describe those statements that positivistsare prepared to accept as meaningful. But then, how might adispute about which other statements are meaningful be settled in anon-arbitrary fashion? To religious believers for whom talk of“Brahman” and “God” is at the center stage ofmeaningful discourse, the use of the principle of empiricalverification will seem arbitrary and question-begging. If thepositivist principle is tightened up too far, it seems to threatenvarious propositions that at least appear to be highly respectable,such as scientific claims about physical processes and events that arenot publicly observable. For example, what are we to think ofstates of the universe prior to all observation of physical strata ofthe cosmos that cannot be observed directly or indirectly but onlyinferred as part of an overriding scientific theory? Or whatabout the mental states of other persons, which may ordinarily bereliably judged, but which, some argue, are under-determined byexternal, public observation? A person's subjectivestates—how one feels—can be profoundly elusive to externalobservers and even to the person him or herself. Can youempirically observe another person's sense of happiness?Arguably, the conscious, subjective states of persons resist airtightverification and the evidence of such states does not meetpositivist's standards (van Cleve 1999, Taliaferro 1994).Also worrisome was the wholesale rejection by positivists of ethics asa cognitive, normative practice. The dismissal of ethics asnon-cognitive had some embarrassing ad hominum force againstan empiricist like Ayer, who regarded ethical claims as lacking anytruth value and yet at the same time he construed empirical knowledgein terms of having the right to certain beliefs. Can anethics of belief be preserved if one dispenses with the normativity ofethics?